Do You Love Being Lied To?

I know I don't.

I promised you all...I WOULD NEVER LIE TO YOU.

I've kept my promise.

I know others whom haven't.

Let's start with the Democratic nominee for the office of the President of the United States, Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton.

She purports to have had pneumonia on Friday, September 9, 2016.

On Sunday, September 11, 2016, something unforseen occurs...and because she isn't being honest with us, I can't tell you exactly what happened. Let me see if we can make a determination one way or another:

At some point, during the 15 year memorial to the deaths of over 3,000 Americans who perished in WTC buildings, 1,2 and 7, and to the lives wasted in a false campaign overseas, Hillary Clinton suffered what she referred to as "being dehydrated", and departed from the memorial. One of two things happened:

• She suffered a collapse, and had to be spirited away by her Secret Service guard; but instead of going to a hospital, she instead was taken to her daughter's apartment (reports have indicated that the address of Chelsea's apartment is also registered as a MEDICAL FACILITY);
• She was arrested (as indicated in the Comments, I have received independent and absolutely trustworthy confirmation from the scene that she was not arrested).

At any rate, she was then shown to appear 90 minutes later, looking fit as a fiddle, and hugged a young girl before re-entering her vehicle, and then disappearing for what was to be five days to recuperate.

Some things to note:

She recuperated incredibly, don't you agree?!?

90 minutes?!?

It's pretty much unheard of in the annals of modern medicine. I would think that if she had access to such a remedy, that she should share that with all of us.

She also hugged a young girl, for whom pneumonia would prove rashly dangerous. Is it worth a child's life to stage a photo op?

Sure...if SHE NEVER HAD PNEUMONIA IN THE FIRST BLOODY PLACE.

I'm only including one link in this entire piece...I want for all of you to VERIFY my piece.

Look up everything I'm writing. You will see for yourself that everything I write here is factual.

The "Clinton" spied leaving Chelsea's apartment has been called a body double, and in my researches, I found one Teresa Barnwell.



Look her up.

She has still not admitted that she may be suffering from Parkinson's disease, but that is the best diagnosis from a number of medical professionals. I will add Dr. Ted Noel's YouTube video at the end.

The following is my opinion of what happened to Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton during the memorial:

"The souls of those dearly departed took offense at her reducing their untimely deaths to a PHOTO-OP, and they took vengeance upon her and caused her to suffer a collapse."

Those were my thoughts upon discovering that she had attended the memorial.

Bayer has successfully convinced Monsanto to accept their buyout offer (over $120 per share), making their merger the largest biotech company thus far. What evils can they now perform?

Farmers are complaining that Roundup runoff is ruining their crops.

Obama, This Be Thy Legacy

We The People need to make America great again, because right now, it isn't.

Soon to be former President Barack Hussein Obama signed into law S.764, also known as DARK Act 2.0, which nullifies not only the recent labeling law established in Vermont, but also around a hundred state laws. Shoppers (I won't use the term "consumers", as if we're all nothing more than cattle, chewing whatever bloody cud that's thrown at us) will now require the use of a smartphone and a bar code scanner app to determine whether or not the item we are deciding to purchase contains GMOs.

If Blackberry were smart, they would repurpose their card readers to scan and display this information. Those who use phones as only phones could benefit from a scanner not much bigger than a business card.

And to think...I once had the opportunity to work with them...but I digress.

It should go without saying that I am profoundly disappointed with the current administration, and I am hoping that Republican candidate Donald John Trump win in such a landslide that any and all efforts to run a VoteScam upon the American people comes to naught.

I'm not giving away anything by saying this: there is going to be a huge groundswell against HRC. Not only has she demonstrated that the rule of law is broken; she has also indicated that she feels that she is above you and I.

That's a huge load of bollocks.

Understand, however; this isn't about hurt feelings - this is about allowing criminals to escape punishment, and therefore aiding and abetting them in their ill-gotten gains. I have my ideas of what happened to her childhood "friend" Vincent Foster, but this isn't the proper venue to discuss such ideas...and many other sites have done a far better job than I might - but I can clearly state that when Clinton had sent individuals into his office before the announcement of his death was made public, and she suffered no repercussions whatsoever, that was a huge mistake that we are now just beginning to realize.

"Just because you ignore politics, that doesn't mean that politics will ignore YOU."

With that said, let's talk about the infamous 28 pages released yesterday.

What justified the wait?

We all knew about the "identities" of 15 of the 19 hijackers, right? What exactly were we to learn from these redacted pages?

In fact, why redact any of it? Isn't the truth of what happened on September 11th, 2001, the business of We The People?

Well, why not reference the Chilcot Report, another document we had to wait far too long to see. Former PM Tony Blair toadied around "taking responsibility" in his role of destroying thriving Middle East nations for the cause of globalism.

Don't want to believe me? Not my problem - it's all in the report.

Okay - back to the scourge at hand. Steven Druker writes about the actual process of how genes are inserted into organisms, and as to how the process is dangerous. I've discussed this, as well:

Obfuscating the unnatural nature of the GM process and ignoring its unsettling features

The bias is evident from the outset, and the authors don’t even provide an honest answer to the initial question: “What is genetic modification (GM) of crops and how is it done?”Their response is substantially misleading because they omit the most unnatural and unsettling features while downplaying the unnaturalness of those they do mention.

In one of the biggest obfuscations, they avoid mentioning that biotechnicians have been inserting foreign DNA into plant genomes in a haphazard manner – and that the insertions not only disrupt the region of DNA into which they wedge but cause disruptions throughout the DNA strand, a phenomenon some scientists call ‘genome scrambling‘. [i]

The authors are equally evasive regarding how the foreign genes are induced to actually function, and they fail to disclose a crucial fact: that inserting a new gene does not in itself endow the plant with the desired new trait. That’s because it’s essential to get the information encoded within the gene expressed into a protein, and in almost every case, that won’t happen without artificial alteration of the inserted genetic material.

Here’s why.

The default condition of most genes is to be inactive and blocked from expressing – which conserves the organism’s energy and prevents proteins from being produced when and where they’re not needed. [ii]

A gene transitions from its closed-down default mode to its active mode through the operation of a regulatory element called a ‘promoter’, a segment of DNA adjoined to the gene that serves as its on/off switch. This switch is finely attuned to specific biochemical signals so that the gene expresses in harmony with the organism’s needs.

Consequently, when a gene is taken from one species and transferred to an unrelated one, the promoter will rarely (if ever) receive signals to which it’s sensitive, and the gene will remain inactive. Hence, before making such transfers, biotechnicians must remove the native promoter and replace it with one that will reliably function in the foreign milieu.

Moreover, to deliver the desired results, the promoter must in most cases not only induce the gene to express, but to boost its expression (and consequent protein production) to an extraordinary level.

For virtually every GM crop on the market, the potent promoter that’s been used to achieve such unusual results comes from a plant virus. Not only does it impel the inserted genes to produce proteins at an abnormally elevated level, it drives the production continuously, regardless of the organism’s needs and completely outside the intricate regulatory system through which its other genes are controlled. This can create serious problems by inducing metabolic imbalances or upsetting complex biochemical feedback loops.

Therefore, given the crucial role played by viral promoters, and the degree to which their employment is unnatural, it’s reasonable to expect that any purportedly balanced account of the GM process would mention them – and to deplore the Society’s utter failure to do so.

 A paraphrasing of my ideas regarding the same (posted to Jon Rappoport's blog):

“NOBODY KNOWS…..

“EXACTLY” HOW MANY OF THESE “HIGHLY TOXIC RESTRICTED EXPERIMENTAL CHEMICALS”…. ARE BEING USED/TESTED IN-CONJUNCTION WITH EACH OTHER HERE ON MAUI & MOLOKAI..”

Monsanto knows…and they’ve known for over 35 years.

What I won’t assume Monsanato knows are the invisible changes that take place when genes are shot into an organism.

The best example I can cite is from Dr. Oz’s show from last week in regards to the Arctic Apple. The apple has been modified to turn off the gene that turns an apple brown once exposed to air.

They were wrong about the pesticides not affecting our gut flora – what else are they utterly wrong about?

 From the Arctic Apple site - How'd We Make A Non-Browning Apple?

When my friends find out about my work with Arctic® apples, invariably one of the first questions they ask is: How’d we do that? That is, how’d we “make” a nonbrowning apple? Here’s what I tell them:

First, a quick biochemistry lesson.  When the cell of a typical apple is ruptured – for example, by biting, slicing or bruising – polyphenol oxidase (PPO) found in one part of the cell mixes with polyphenolics found in another part of the cell. (PPO is a plant enzyme. Polyphenolics are one of the many types of chemical substrates that serve various purposes, including supplying its aroma and flavor.) When PPO and polyphenolics mix, brown-toned melanin is left behind.

Arctic® apples produce practically no PPO so that enzymatic browning reaction never occurs.  This means Arctic® apples’ polyphenols aren’t burned up when the apple is bitten, sliced, or otherwise bruised. No chemical reaction, no yucky brown apple left behind.

So how’d we “make” a nonbrowning apple? The small number of genes  (four, to be exact) that control PPO production were identified several years back, when the apple’s genome was mapped. To create a nonbrowning Arctic® version of an existing apple variety, our science team uses gene silencing to turn down the expression of PPO, which virtually eliminates PPO production, so the fruit doesn’t brown. This genetic transformation is aided by modern science tools. (We’ll explain what we mean by “modern science tools” in a later post.)

This transformation takes place in a laboratory in a petri dish, with a small sample of apple tissue. We confirm the genetic transformation was successfully completed before growing the tissue out into a tiny plantlet and eventually moving it to an orchard. (We’ll explain how we confirm the transformation in a later post, too.)

Personally, I was amazed to find out how “simple” this transformation process is. (I put the word in quotes out of deference to the head of our science team, Dr. John Armstrong, who knows best how much hard work and brain power went into making this process look simple to me.)

The end result of all this science is just an apple tree, now with very low PPO production to prevent enzymatic browning in its fruit. Our Arctic® apple trees grow and behave in the orchard, blossom and bear fruit just like their conventional counterparts. We’ve got almost 10 years of test orchard experience to document that. Arctic® apples are also compositionally and nutritionally similar to conventional apples, further indicating that lower levels of PPO aren’t consequential to the tree or the fruit. It’s only when one of our apples is bitten, sliced or cut that the Arctic® apple difference becomes clear.

What role does PPO play in the plant, you might ask? In some plants, PPO plays a defensive role – for example, tomatoes produce high levels of PPO when attacked by pests or pathogens. In contrast, apples produce very low levels of PPO, and only in very young fruit.  Its presence is probably left over from apples of ages ago, playing no role in today’s apples.

I always close my talk with friends with this intriguing sidebar to the story: When eaten by humans, polyphenolics may have health-promoting benefits. For example, phenolics are believed to act as antioxidants, fighting the well-documented damaging effects that oxidation can have on the heart, other organs and throughout the body. Not enough is known yet about phenolics for the health community to suggest a recommended intake amount, as for other vitamins and nutrients such as Vitamin C (the best-known antioxidant), fiber and so on – but they are certainly worth watching!

Sounds great, right? Well, let's just think about this for a second.

What processes within your body are utterly isolated from all others?

For example - if you take a single step forward, does it affect the rest of your body at all?

Of course it does.

All biologic functions are intertwined.

Turning off the browning feature of the apple will cause an unforeseen reaction in the balance of the fruit, regardless of their fluffy press releases.

Let me end today with this - I believe that people aren't suffering from gluten intolerance; we are suffering from glyphosate intolerance.

Three Monsanto executives accused of massive financial fraud, barred from accounting for LIFE (Re-Post from Patriot Rising)

Three Monsanto executives accused of massive financial fraud, barred from accounting for LIFE

Posted 03/10/2016 9:43 am by PatriotRising with 0 comments

Monsanto is not renowned for its moral standing – but this latest controversy makes you wonder, “just how low can the company go?” Earlier this month it was announced that the Monsanto Co., an enormous agribusiness based in St. Louis, has yet again been up to no good. Monsanto is required to pay $80 million to settle claims that it has been improperly accounting for various expenses tied to customer rebates for a well-known product, Roundup.
According to Bloomberg Business, the Securities and Exchange Commission found that Monsanto was booking revenue from a product discount program without properly recognizing all of its costs. Three company executives have also agreed to pay penalties to settle the charges against them.

Who is Monsanto?

If you haven’t heard of Monsanto, this company is one of the biggest agribusinesses in the world and produces many different agricultural products, including the weedkiller Roundup, which is widely used across the U.S. and the world. Over recent years, Roundup has gained a lot of negative press due to its widespread usage and documented adverse health effects. Glyphosate is actually a lot like nerve gas and has been associated with damaging health, including causing cancer and kidney failure and disrupting the reproductive and endocrine systems.
Monsanto is heavily invested in genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and has received a great deal of negative publicity in recent years due to the extent of its corporate manipulation and deceit. In fact, according to the website Who Is Monsanto?, the company is the world’s largest producer of genetically engineered (GE) seeds. These seeds are resistant to Roundup, which is toxic to other plants. This is a win-win for Monsanto; however, when these GE crops are harvested, they contain extremely high levels of that nasty chemical glyphosate.
Monsanto has historically developed numerous toxic products that later have to be restricted or totally banned to reduce environmental or health disasters – including DDT, bovine growth hormone and PCBs. With all of this in mind, it’s no surprise that Monsanto’s reputation has been going downhill. But the recent financial fraud leaves you wondering – what more can this sinister company be hiding?
According to Food & Water Watch, there is a suspected link between the government and Monsanto. In fact, U.S. ambassadors are thought to have been pushing the sales of GMO seeds on behalf of the biotech industry. The report states, “The U.S. State Department has launched a concerted strategy to promote agricultural biotechnology, often over the opposition of the public and governments, to the near exclusion of other more sustainable, more appropriate agricultural policy alternatives.”

---

 

---

Monsanto’s most recent scandal

An SEC investigation found that Monsanto had insufficient internal accounting controls to properly account for millions of dollars in rebates that had been offered to retailers and distributors of cancer-causing Roundup herbicide, according to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Generic competition had managed to undercut Monsanto’s prices, and this resulted in a notable loss of market share for the agribusiness – so Monsanto’s sales team began to advise U.S. retailers to maximize their Roundup purchases in the fourth quarter and participate in a rebate program in 2009. They also offered rebates to distributors who met set volume targets.
Monsanto has been found to have been booking revenue from this product discount program without properly recognizing all of its costs. For their part in the fraud, three Monsanto executives have been fined a total of $135,000, and two of them who were accounting executives have been barred from accounting for life. However, despite the personal penalties that the executives must pay, they will have undoubtedly made a fortune during their time with Monsanto – lining both their own pockets and that of the evil agribusiness.
Sources include:
Natural.News
Bloomberg.com
SEC.gov
WhoIsMonsanto.com
MonsantoMafia.com
TruthWiki.org
Science.NaturalNews.com
Ambassadors Report May 2013.pdf”>FoodAndWaterWatch.org^[PDF]
 

---

Check out The Survival / Homesteading / Preparedness / Sustainability PDF Page! (Nearly 3000 free .PDF Files)

A quick reminder for you to read about something called GcMAF, and how our bodies have been compromised.


I noticed that I had gained a couple of new readers, who immediately ran for the hills after my off-topic posting on the events of September 11th, 2001...the cause is very dear to me, and we are still being lied to; worse, because of said lies, those who had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with that day are being punished:


Iran ordered to pay $10.5 billion for 9/11 by US judge


You can read it at the site, if you wish. This is my take on it...knowing what I do about the events of September 11th (the information gleaned from the MSM, as well as my own sources, public and private), it is utter bollocks to order Iran to do much of anything in regards to the events of that day. If anything, they are the unwitting victims of the super-predators that are wiping out the indigenous populations of the region by the thousands. Of course, to publicly make such a claim, in the eyes of those asshats, could be construed as aiding an "enemy", and if there's one thing that I am, it's that I am a PATRIOT. I will defend these United States against all enemies, whether they be foreign or domestic.


What most people simply don't get is that on September 11th, 2001, we were beset by BOTH, working in collusion.


Whenever I see "9/11 Was An Inside Job", or the like, I know that we are only getting part of the story. You can't make an informed decision with only part of the necessary data.


This is the same with FrankenFoods. The bastards want you and I to ingest this crap, and to trust them wholly with not being concerned about how we will be affected, while they chow down on REAL food.


That's not gonna work for me...and I hope that I have at least convinced you to take more than a cursory look into what YOU are ingesting.


You will thank me later...but maybe I can save you some discomfort, and you'll listen to me now.


Don't let the DARK Act pass (now 2.0!).


Grow rooftop gardens.


Grow inside your living spaces.


Save seeds and share with your neighbors and friends.


We can beat them...but we have to be in the game.


Update: Here's the TDAP insert - thanks to Jim Stone:

Did TIP Just Expose The Truth Behind "9/11 Trutherism"?

I'm really good at puzzles.

Likewise, I have been designated as being "bright"; in other words, I can make logical leaps of thought between two or more not-necessarily related topics.

I find myself not at work today. I woke with a migraine, which subsided as I decided I wasn't going in today.

What do you think that means?

I know...but that isn't germane to this discussion.

I am a reader (and sometimes commentor) on Professor James Tracy's blog, The Memory Hole Blog. Professor Tracy was formerly a tenured educator at Florida Atlantic University, until he was removed by the school for questioning the events of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings, purportedly acted out by Adam Lanza. Check out the interview by Jon Rappoport.

The information is there for you to peruse and to make up your own mind...but I'm certain that you will agree with me that no one should lose their means of employment due to their own interpretation of events.

The facts are not settled (a reference to Al Gore and his insistence that "the science is settled" in regards to global warming/climate change).

In a very recent posting, a non-tenured professor at Oberlin College is facing explusion:

Israeli Public Relations Group Leads Lynch Mob Against Black Professor 

As I was reading the piece, something caught my eye:

9/11 Trutherism.

When did that become an invective?

If you read my piece, How To Bitch-Slap A Moron, you may recall that the moron in question had added, in addition to his other baseless charges, that I was a "9/11 Truther".

When did that become a bad thing?

Anyone with a working brain knows that We The People haven't yet heard the truth of the events of September 11th, 2001. If anyone would like for me to back up this assertion, let me know, and I'll be glad to do so.

I want you to take a moment, and pause to consider what I'm going to write - please don't engage in the knee-jerk reaction that you may have when you see what's being written.

Some people are turned off by 9/11 Truthers because they are "offended" by what they hear.

"Offended".

I don't believe that being "offended" is just cause for removing someone from their place of employment.

At no point does the "offense" in regards to 9/11 Trutherism have anything to do whatsoever with the plausibility of the assertions of those whom hold said views. It's all about "outrage" - outrage that someone could think such things.

I'm outraged that some idiots out there could think that I'd take that utterly retarded story of a guy on a dialysis machine orchestrating the largest mass murder to take place on American soil, and our defenses having absolutely no way to stop it.

In addition, they:

• Performed put options on major airlines for four days;
• Stood down NORAD;
• Couldn't find the agents in Hollywood, Florida;
• Made air traffic controller supervisors destroy audiotape evidence;
• Knew to remove gold from the vaults under the WTC complex;
• Remove bomb-sniffing dogs from the WTC buildings;

Need I continue? Those are just ancillary cases in which the story offered to us cannot stand.

When one doesn't have the facts, or logic, on their side, they will usually attack the messenger.

This is what happened to Professor Tracy, and what is happening to Professor Joy Karega.

Have some ideas that fall out of the mainstream?

This could happen to YOU.

Vincent Nunes Does NOT Have A Police Record! (R8 Re-Post)

Vincent Nunes Does NOT Have A Police Record!

posted by Vincent Nunes
Wed, 10/03/2012 - 5:43am

I would like to begin this with a thank-you to Officer Cahill and his partner.
Now, I won't get into the specifics of our impromptu meeting, but what I will divulge is that I haven't a record in regards to the Police Department of New York City.
Nothing. Nada. Ziparoonie.
That is a badge of honour I will proudly wield.
I actually have a pretty good relationship with New York's Finest. Not coincidentally, I went to high school with a couple of classmates who became officers, and have now since retired with their families. I hope to see them soon - it's going to be a surprise (I did).
I'm thinking of writing to all of the fast food companies in regards to replacing their sugared products with stevia. I realize the article I wrote not too recently, Why Hizzoner's Sugary Drink Ban Is Simply A Money Grab For The Soda Companies, was a bit off-focus. The soft-drink ban seems only to affect movie theaters and truck stops - I was of the impression that supermarkets would no longer offer the larger sizes of drinks. Regardless, because of the obesity epidemic, we need to do something that actually addresses the problem (Having written this, I've tried a number of products - Starbucks drinks taste fine, but other beverages are using Truvia, which contains dextrose, and seems to give yet another horrible aftertaste - is it possible that some out there are trying to poison the idea of using stevia?).
At one time, it was mandated that all of our water had to be inundated with fluoride. It sounded like a great idea at the time, until studies revealed that the fluoride being used was a waste product from the production of aluminum, and that we were getting the opposite of the desired results. I mean, if there was any real concern with the well-being of the health of Americans, why not mandate that all faucets and fixtures have Brita filters added by default? (Of course, I don't mean to single out Brita - Culligan, Berkey, etc. - any companies' filters would be welcome.)
How about vitamin C?
I'm just thinking outside the box, here.
My nephew is on the borderline to becoming diabetic, and I wish to spare him any bit of the pain I've experienced. At the same time, television advertising bombards him daily with ads for this food and that drink, all containing either sugar or high fructose corn syrup (HFCS), or aspartame and/or sucralose, unnatural compounds, to say the least.
I'd love to go to Burger King and grab a Whopper and a raspberry smoothie...but I can't do it. It isn't worth the risk.
I haven't had a Big Mac in a good while...but guess what? I'll live.
These companies are making profits hand over fist; and yet, they won't protect their consumer base.
When Morgan Spurlock was making Supersize Me, I'm fairly certain that he didn't really think he was putting his life and his health in jeopardy by maintaining a fast food only diet for 30 days.
Think about those who do this as a matter of course, without thinking.
I used to work for a fellow who had dirty water dogs every weekday, unless we were off-site. He seemed to be okay, but I haven't checked in on him lately.
So this is relatively straight-forward: do you agree with me that we can actually do something substantial in regards to the obesity epidemic, and remove the main cause of the obesity itself from our daily diets?
Should I embark on a letter writing campaign?
Would you all join me? I'll draft the letter, post it here; you can take it as it is and sign your name to it, or take whatever tickles your fancy and make it yours - it doesn't matter. The important part is doing something to help our children, our friends, our families and ourselves. Just think about not having to worry about the calorie count of your beverages.
Isn't that something that actually tackles the issue?
I await your responses, dear readers.


Update - 11/20/2014: I've wanted to talk about this for a very long time...especially since the non-actions following the events of September 11th, 2001.


What do I mean?


I'm talking about the fact that none of the people who should be penalized for their actions/inactions on that day have seen as much as a handcuff, much less a jail cell, complete with Bubba, the Love Partner. Conversely, individuals such as Colleen Rowley, Sibel Edmonds and many others are suffering for what is being termed as whistleblowing.


How is this possible?


In a world run by FOOLS, anything is possible.


We purport to being a nation of laws; yet, it seems that those same laws can be perverted to protect the guilty, and punishing the innocent.


This isn't sour grapes on my part. In our constitutional republic, no one is above any law.


Going after whistleblowers, and NOT the crimes they are alerting to everyone, only allows the guilty to continue their crimes.

Vincenzo's Crock Pot #15 - It's The End Of The World As We Know It (R8 Re-Post)

Vincenzo's Crock Pot #15 - It's The End Of The World As We Know It (Off-topic, but pertinent due to our current Ebola/Enterovirus D68 crisis) 

posted by Vincent Nunes
Fri, 12/21/2012 - 11:41am

A man who produces something of value, or helps to keeps things that produce something of value working, are worth more and should be compensated more than one who just moves monies around. Banks are no longer "risking money"; indeed, if there's any risk, it's borne upon We The People.

I just want you to think about that.

You should read Philip Giraldi's article, Christmas in Connecticut.

This is the Crock Pot, so let's flavor this bad boy with some good helpings.

This is the last day on the Mayan calendar, but that never meant that it signified the end of existence. I like to think of this as an opportunity for a new beginning - it has been indicated that there are celestial alignments taking place; of course, this is the Winter Solstice.

I'm going to write something really controversial right now.

It was a good thing that George Walker Bush stole the election against Albert Gore in 2000.

WhatwhatWHAT?!?

What could I possibly mean by that?

I just watched a video compilation by Ryan Dawson, the producer of a number of films regarding the events of September 11th, 2001. I'm sure that many of you out there wonder why I just don't type "9/11" like everyone else does. Well, I don't believe that the tragedy and destruction visited upon us over 11 years ago should be relegated to a goddamn cutesy term like "9/11" or "Ground Zero", like we're referring to a day when we had a triple rainbow in the sky. It's much worse than that. It was the day that our government failed We The People:

• It was the day after $2.3 TRILLION DOLLARS went missing from the Pentagon, yet no investigation into those missing funds has been forthcoming. Some would say that it's impossible to track because the attack that took out the Pentagon directly impacted the offices that provided for the accounting. That's a load. Dov Zackheim was in charge of those funds - you mean, he can't be be held accountable? Where's Columbo when you need him?
• Let's go the the main narrative itself - that two commercial aircraft took out three buildings. It is laughable at best. Yet, this is the story they're sticking to. You have to understand - it's a slap in the face to anyone not blinded by a manufactured hate for brown-skinned Middle Easterners. Before them, it was the Russians, remember? Don't forget about the impromptu rave going on across the water.

• Our wiretap system was compromised by a foreign nation, who then used said compromised system as an early warning for their drug traffickers, and further to blackmail our representatives (the ones not caught in honeytraps). This was a main component in Carl Cameron's four-part report on spying within the United States; of course, you may not have seen this report, since Abe Foxman nearly gave birth whining about it. It was erased from the FOX News archives. Of course, I have them.
• FEMA was in New York City the night before - why does that remind me of BATF officials not being in the Murrah Building the day of its destruction, due to an unnamed investigation? Just as an aside, it's inconceivable that a truck bomb so far from the building could do what it was purported to have done.
• The anthrax attacks, purported to have been committed by Muslims, was a psy-op of the lowest order. The conflation of America with Israel was clumsily performed; worse, the anthrax used was traced to Fort Detrick. The lab had been broken into by Lt. Col. Philip Zack, though the trail was led instead to Steven Hatfill, when the frameup of Dr. Asaad went awry. When the Hatfill frame failed, Bruce Ivins was made the patsy, who shortly then committed suicide. Dead men tell no tales; nor do they put the lie to bad frameups.
• The seismic recordings at the Lamont-Doherty Observatory indicate readings far beyond what impacts from jetliners could produce. Why hasn't this gone any further?
• Wait - how could I mention the anthrax attacks without mentioning that our representatives were warned to tak Cipro? Who warned them? Tim Osman? (Actually, it was Jerome Hauer.) 

I could go on and on, but I just wanted to mak a point of all of the avenues of exploration that have gone untouched. I mentioned Ryan's video - in it, you will see CNN's Piers Morgan arguing with former Minnesota governer and Conspiracy Theory's Jesse Ventura that there were never reports of the Saloman Building, also known as WTC Building Seven, collapsing before 5:20 PM.
CNN did it.
The BBC did it.
FOX did it.
CBS did it.
I have downloaded 42 gigabytes regarding all of the news occurring on September 11th, 2001. I've got it.
You know what's also mentioned? At 10:45 AM, there are reports of an explosion. It's never mentioned again. Was that supposed to be Flight 93? I can only speculate upon this point, and I'd rather deal with the facts of the situation.
But I do wish to speculate upon one point - that if Albert Gore were our President, rather than George Walker Bush, our nation would be worse off.
How can I say this?
George Walker Bush is a fool. But George Walker Bush is also a coward. That cowardice saved us from mutually assured destruction eleven years ago - destruction that would have come forth as a result of the bluster of a liar.
Albert Gore is a liar.
Albert Gore is lying about Anthropogenic Human-caused Global Warming (now alternating with "Climate Change", when appropriate).
Climategate has borne this out - Michael Mann, Phil Jones and their collaborators have gamed the system with their corrupted "peer review" circus which kept dissenting views from being posted in the climate journals and from the public.
And let's just apply some basic logic here - what does trading carbon credits have to do with improving carbon emissions? Do carbon emissions follow market share?
Furthermore, CO2 is an essential element necessary to the propogation of life on our planet. Plants require CO2, and in turn, provide O2 (oxygen) for us to breathe. This is why deforestation is utterly foolish. We could plant hemp, which would restore the viability and arability of the soil, and provide to us so much more than just pulp for paper.
It is my view that not only did Bush the Shrub steal the election, Gore threw the election.
He dove like Greg Louganis, baby!
The vote discrepancies alone should have mandated a recount - a real recount, not that dog-and-pony show we got. In return, I believe he was promised that he would be enriched by the scheme of saving the world from "global warming" .
Wow.
That was quite a mouthful, huh?
Did you hear about Lord Monckton using the microphone of the delegate from Myanmar to tell all assembled that there is no basis for the claims of the IPCC for the last eighteen years. He was removed from the Doha conference, but there's no doubt that the gravy train of easy profits that they all planned to board has just ran out of steam.
Now of course, you're asking: what does this have to do with the events of September 11th, 2001?
I don't believe in an "inside job" when it comes to the events of September 11th; I do when it comes to the financial malfeasance that has the middle class of America poorer day by day. There were elements of our government who were aware of those events - there were a number of people warned not to fly on September 11th, notably Willie Brown and author of the Satanic Verses, Salman Rushdie.
I did state that Bush was a coward. His cowardice accounts for his photo-op at Booker Elementary School (where he mentions that he saw the first plane impact - an impossible feat that he mentioned twice, since that footage wasn't available until September 12, 2001 on broadcast and cable news). If he had any foreknowledge whatsoever of those events, he wanted nothing directly to do with them; instead, he put the lives of a number of children at risk, something that we now know is not above reproach - ask the families of the victims of the Newtown, Connecticut massacre.
Considering Gore's collusion with the climate thieves, I posit that he would have had an active hand in the staging of the events of September 11th, and when things went wrong, like the WTC Twin Towers "collapsing" out of sequence; WTC 7 collapsing from nothing; the attack on the Pentagon failing to leave plane debris commesurate with a multi-ton aircraft, much as the crash of Flight 93; NORAD failing to properly account for the whearabouts of said flights; when all those things and more had gone wrong, he would have upped the ante and forced us over the edge of diplomacy.
Understand, of course, this is merely conjecture on my part. Just think, though - "Global warming" is a fallacy - the Earth goes through warming and cooling periods, and we could no more predict the weather ten years from now than we could ten days from now. If he was willing to stick with the script for that load of bollocks, what would he have done in the face of an attack on America?
Geez - it's a bit morbid in here - let's get ready for a brand new day.
The facility that was complicit in the lack of care and the eventual untimely death of the Kung-Fu Judge, the Honorable John L. Phillips, has been slapped with a class-action law suit - oh, happy day! Let justice prevail!
Congratulations to Steve Tefft for becoming Ink Master!
Best wishes to all my friends and their families this holiday season!
Best wishes also go out to all of you, dear readers! Let's start a brand new era of enlightenment - there is nothing to fear but fear itself.

Monsanto Is Bad News (Updated With Information that Should Startle You) (R8 Re-Post)

Monsanto Is Bad News (Updated With Information that Should Startle You)

posted by Vincent Nunes
Thu, 02/09/2012 - 8:47pm

What more must I do to get you, dear readers, to understand that Monsanto is BAD NEWS?

Organic Farmers Take On Seed Behemoth Monsanto In Our Very Own Brooklyn

By Melissa Cronin on February 9th, 2012 (many hours ago)

Last week, a coalition of organic farmers took the floor to defend their livelihoods against the world’s largest producer of commercial seeds and well-known evil corporation, Monsanto. The Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association, OSGATA, descended on the Southern District Court on Pearl Street in Brooklyn on Tuesday, along with hundreds of other activists representing the 300,000 plaintiffs that are raising an enormous case against the seed behemoth.
The hearing [full document here] was part of an ongoing case by OSGATA aimed at preventing Monsanto from suing small farmers when strains of their genetically-modified and legally-patented seeds are found in their fields, blown in from nearby farms. Because Monsanto has patented their strain, the chemical giant could sue these organic farmers for patent infringement if this happens, a power which OSGATA claims in unfair, and that any contamination would be inadvertent on the farmer’s part.
The hearing was held to give the organic farmers an opportunity to refute the motion to dismiss the case, proposed by Monsanto back in July, on the grounds that the charges were hypothetical and abstract. The entire issue has stemmed from Monsanto’s refusal to sign a contract promising not to sue if trace amounts of their seeds’ genetics were found in other farmers’ crops, leading many to believe that their patent laws would be enforced. For farmers who would never use Monsanto seeds intentionally, but who would be susceptible to seeds blown over from nearby farms, this is a terrifying prospect.
Not only is Monsanto reserving the right to sue over something the farmers can’t control, the corporation’s omnipresence is also weakening organic crops. Many organic farmers worry that if their seeds are contaminated by Monsanto’s genetically modified (GMO) seeds, which are resistant to the company’s toxic herbicide Roundup, they will no longer test as genetically organic, leading to the loss of buyers, and potential bankruptcy. They fear that the GMO seeds will out-compete their own organic seeds, and that these crops are unsafe for people to eat. And that fear is not unfounded: a 2010 study in the International Journal of Biological Sciences found that Monsanto’s genetically modified corn was linked to organ failure in mammals.
On the company website, Monsanto has pledged not to exercise its patent rights when trace amounts of their patented seed are present in farmers’ fields as a result of inadvertent means. But CBS News’ Armen Keteyian reported last January that Monsanto investigators often trespass onto farmers’ land and harass them, threatening to sue for patent infringement.
Organic farmers cite Monsanto’s history of producing dangerous chemicals as evidence to the potency of its products. During the Vietnam War, Monsanto produced the 20 million gallons of extremely toxic Agent Orange, contaminating 3 million people, including US soldiers. Half a million people died and cancers, genetic deformities, and miscarriages have increases enormously, even generations later.
The Washington Post also led an investigation in 2002 which found that Monsanto had dumped millions of pounds of toxic PCBs in landfills in Alabama, causing a cancer cluster and an incredible amount of chemical pollution.
For the group gathered on Pearl Street last week, the case against Monsanto seems like David versus Goliath. Monsanto has undertaken one of the most aggressive patent assertion campaigns in history, said Dan Ravicher, the Executive Director of the Public Patent Foundation, in a press release.
“We have farmers who have stopped growing organic corn, organic canola and organic soybeans because they can’t risk being sued by Monsanto,” said the president of OSGATA, Jim Gerritsen. “It’s not fair and it’s not right.”

Read more: Organic Farmers Take On Seed Behemoth Monsanto In Our Very Own Brooklyn · NYU Local http://nyulocal.com/city/2012/02/09/organic-farmers-take-on-seed-behemoth-monsanto-in-our-very-own-brooklyn/#ixzz1lwGploLN

Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Here's more:

Monsanto Declared Worst Company of 2011

Anthony Gucciardi & Mike Barrett
NaturalSociety
December 6, 2011

Biotech giant Monsanto has been declared the Worst Company of 2011 by NaturalSociety for threatening both human health and the environment. The leader in genetically modified seeds and crops, Monsanto is currently responsible for 90 percent of the genetically engineered seed on the United States market. Outside of GM seeds, Monsanto is also the creator of the best-selling herbicide Roundup, which has spawned over 120 million hectacres of herbicide-resistant superweeds while damaging much of the soil. Despite hard evidence warning against the amplified usage of genetically modified crops, biopesticides, and herbicides, Monsanto continues to disregard all warning signs.
In a powerful review of 19 studies analyzing the dangers of GMO crops such as corn and soybeans, researchers revealed some shocking information regarding the safety of these popular food staples. Researchers found that consumption of GMO corn or soybeans may lead to significant organ disruptions in rats and mice – particularly in the liver and kidneys. This is particularly concerning due to the fact that 93 percent of U.S. soybeans are known to be genetically modified. Ignoring this evidence, Monsanto continues to expand their genetic manipulation.

Monsanto’s Genetic Manipulation of Nature

Outside of genetically modifying crops, Monsanto has also created genetically modified crops containing Bt. Bt is a toxin incorporated in GMO crops that are intended to kill different insects, however Bt usage has subsequently spawned insect populations which are resistant to the biopesticide. After being exposed to Bt, many insect populations actually mutated to resist the biopesticide. So far at least 8 insect populations have developed resistance, with 2 populations resistant to Bt sprays and at least 6 species resistant to Bt crops as a whole. Farmers are therefore forced to use even more pesticides to combat the resistant bugs.
What is the answer to this problem, according to Monsanto? To further genetically modify the Bt crop to make it a super-pesticide, killing the resistant insects.
Tests, however, have concluded that further modified Bt toxin crop provided ‘little or no advantage’ in tackling the insects, despite extensive time and funding put into the research. It seems that Monsanto’s solution to everything is to further modify it into oblivion, even in the face of evidence proving this method to be highly inefficient. The research shows that this will undoubtedly lead to insects that are resistant to the most potent forms of Bt and other modified toxins, resulting in the use of even more excessive amounts of pesticides in order to combat pests.

Superweeds Infesting Over 120 Million Hectacres of Farmland

Thanks to Monsanto’s best-selling herbicide Roundup, farms across the world are experiencing the emergence of herbicide-resistant superweeds. The heavily resistant weeds have an immunity to glyphosate, an herbicide that Roundup contains. These resistant weeds currently cover over 4.5 million hectares in the United States alone, though experts estimate the world-wide land coverage to have reached at least 120 million hectares by 2010. The appearance of these superweeds is being increasingly documented in Australia, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Europe and South Africa.
Of course, once again, the resistant weeds are so resistant to roundup that they require excessive amounts of herbicides. It is no surprise that the company is refusing to accept responsibility for the escalating cost of combating the weeds, stating that “Roundup agricultural warranties will not cover the failure to control glyphosate resistant weed populations.”

The World Says No to Monsanto

France, Hungary, and Peru are a few of the countries that have decided to take a stand against Monsanto. Hungary actually went as far as to destroy 1000 acres of maize found to have been grown with genetically modified seeds, according to Hungary deputy state secretary of the Ministry of Rural Development Lajos Bognar. Peru has also taken a stand for health freedom, passing a monumental 10 year ban on genetically modified foods. Amazingly, Peru’s Plenary Session of the Congress made the decision despite previous governmental pushes for GM legalization. The known and unknown dangers of GMO crops seem to supersede even executive-level governmental directives.
Anibal Huerta, President of Peru’s Agrarian Commission, said the ban was needed to prevent the ”danger that can arise from the use of biotechnology.”
France is the latest nation to say no to Monsanto’s GM corn maize, even in light of an overturned ban. It all began when France’s State Council overturned the ban on Monsanto’s GMO maize stating that it was not sufficiently justified. The organization then attempted to justify its decision by saying that the government did not give enough evidence to justify a ban. Under law, an EU country can only unilaterally ban a genetically modified strain if it can scientifically prove it is a risk to the health of humans, animals, or the integrity of the environment.
Even after the ban was overturned, it surfaced that French legislatures were planning to launch new restrictions regarding the use of Monsanto’s 810 maize on French soil. Even Nicolas Sarkozy, the current president of the French Republic, voiced his opposition to Monsanto’s GMO maize:

“The French government keeps and will keep its opposition against the cultivation of the Monsanto 810 maize on our soil,” Sarkozy said.

Worst Company of 2011

In nominating Monsanto the Worst Company of 2011 we are hoping to raise awareness over the threat that Monsanto poses to human health and the environment. Genetically modified organisms will only continue to threaten all living creatures if not stopped. It is through spreading the word that real change will come about, and declaring Monsanto the Worst Company of 2011 is a great way to highlight all of their reckless actions.

Read more: http://naturalsociety.com/monsanto-declared-worst-company-of-2011/#ixzz1lwHhI3Q0

Support labeling of GMOs: http://truthinlabelingcoalition.org/
Update (2/21/2012): I've two more gems for you:
Millions Of Pounds Of TOXIC POISON To Flood U.S. Farmland
Monsanto's GMO Corn LINKED To ORGAN FAILURE
The damage already done to our soil can be remedied by planting hemp, and using said crop to replace production of products that will benefit from the versatility of hemp.
The second link comes from the Huffington Post. Arianna Huffington (or an interested subordinate), once upon a time, used to host my Room 8 pieces, until I began to delve into my research in regards to the events of September 11th, 2001.
If you aren't aware, Arianna does not host postings that "subscribe to conspiracy theory"; you'll remember that she de-hosted a piece by former Minnesota Governor Jess Ventura, no less. I was glad for the cross-posting at the time; I sometimes suspected that she had plans to abduct my person and to make me her "boy toy"...but I digress.
That being said, if she's posting a piece about Monsanto's products, you'd do well to pay attention.
Pay attention to this little bit of information, as well:

The staff cafeteria at biotech-crop Monsanto’s UK headquarters reportedly banned GM foods from the menu back in 1999. The private catering company running the canteen, Sutcliffe Catering, owned by Granada Food Services, told its clients, including Monsanto, that it would no longer use foods containing GM soya or maize because of “customer concerns” about the technology. “We have taken the steps to ensure that you, the customer, can feel confident in the food we serve,” Granada told its customers.

The people making these FrankenFoods WON'T EAT THEM!!!
I need to say this as clear as possible, this next line.
A corporation is in business to make money.
Period.
I don't need to bold the text in that line.
I don't need to underline or italicize it. It speaks for itself. I don't want to engage in hyperbole. I just want to tell you, in plain English, in plain terms, that if you care about your life at all; if you care about the lives of your friends, your family, your future; you will not allow a corporation that is in the business of making money, and nothing else but that, to control our food supply.
If you value your health and your freedom, you will pick up your phone, you will call your representatives, and you will express your concern with these issues.
Do this for yourselves.

Contact Elected Officials

Call, e-mail, or mail U.S. state and federal elected officials and government agencies.

• President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden
• U.S. Senators
• U.S. Representatives
• State Governors
• State Legislators
• Tweet a Message to Your Representatives
• Contact Your Government, by Agency
• Contact Your Government, by Topic

Your country is counting on you.

To end this piece, why don't I post the missing piece in question, so you can decide for yourself whether it was worthy of reading.
Have a good day.
Huffington Post/Jesse Ventura – Article #2 (“American Conspiracies”)

WHAT REALLY HAPPENED ON SEPTEMBER 11TH?
You didn’t see anything about it in the mainstream media, but two weeks ago at a conference in San Francisco, more than one thousand architects and engineers signed a petition demanding that Congress begin a new investigation into the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11.
That’s right, these people put their reputations in potential jeopardy – because they don’t buy the government’s version of events. They want to know how 200,000 tons of steel disintegrated and fell to the ground in 11 seconds. They question whether the hijacked planes were responsible – or whether it could have been a controlled demolition from inside that brought down the Twin Towers and Building 7.
Richard Gage, a member of the American Institute of Architects and the founder of Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth, put it like this: “The official Federal Emergency Management [Agency] and National Institute of Standards and Technology reports provide insufficient, contradictory and fraudulent accounts of the circumstances of the towers’ destruction.” He’s especially disturbed by Building 7, whose 447 stories came down in “pure free-fall acceleration” that afternoon – even though it was never hit by an aircraft.
This is a subject I take up in my new book, American Conspiracies , published this week by Skyhorse. An excerpt follows:

Some people have argued that the twin towers went down, within a half hour of one another, because of the way they were constructed. Well, those 425,000 cubic yards of concrete and 200,000 tons of steel were designed to hold up against a Boeing 707, the largest plane built at the time the towers were completed in 1973. Analysis had shown that a 707 traveling at 600 miles an hour (and those had four engines) would not cause major damage. The twin-engine Boeing 757s that hit on 9/11 were going 440 and 550 miles an hour.
Still, we are told that a molten, highly intense fuel mixture from the planes brought down these two steel-framed skyscrapers. Keep in mind that no other such skyscraper in history had ever been known to collapse completely due to fire damage. So could it actually have been the result of a controlled demolition from inside the buildings? I don’t claim expertise about this, but I did work four years as part of the Navy’s underwater demolition teams, where we were trained to blow things to hell and high water. And my staff talked at some length with a prominent physicist, Steven E. Jones, who says that a “gravity driven collapse” without demolition charges defies the laws of physics. These buildings fell, at nearly the rate of free-fall, straight down into their own footprint, in approximately ten seconds. An object dropped from the roof of the 110-story-tall towers would reach the ground in about 9.2 seconds. Then there’s the fact that steel beams that weighed as much as 200,000 pounds got tossed laterally as far as 500 feet.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) started its investigation on August 21, 2002. When their 10,000-page-long report came out three years later, the spokesman said there was no evidence to suggest a controlled demolition. But Steven E. Jones also says that molten metal found underground weeks later is proof that jet fuel couldn’t have been all that was responsible. I visited the site about three weeks after 9/11, with Governor Pataki and my wife Terry. It didn’t mean anything to me at the time, but they had to suspend digging that day because they were running into heat pockets of huge temperatures. These fires kept burning for more than three months, the longest-burning structure blaze ever. And this was all due to jet fuel? We’re talking molten metal more than 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit.
Probably the most conclusive evidence about a controlled demolition is a research paper (two years, nine authors) published in the peer-reviewed Open Chemical Physics Journal , in April 2009. In studying dust samples from the site, these scientists found chips of nano-thermite, which is a high-tech incendiary/explosive. Here’s what the paper’s lead author, Dr. Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen’s chemistry department, had to say about the explosive that he’s convinced brought down the Twin Towers and the nearby Building 7:
“Thermite itself dates back to 1893. It is a mixture of aluminum and rust-powder, which react to create intense heat. The reaction produces iron, heated to 2500 degrees Centigrade. This can be used to do welding. It can also be used to melt other iron. So in nano-thermite, this powder from 1893 is reduced to tiny particles, perfectly mixed. When these react, the intense heat develops much more quickly. Nano-thermite can be mixed with additives to give off intense heat, or serve as a very effective explosive. It contains more energy than dynamite, and can be used as rocket fuel.” [i]
Richard Gage is one of hundreds of credentialed architects and structural engineers who have put their careers on the line to point out the detailed anomalies and many implications of controlled demolition in the building collapses. As he puts it bluntly: “Once you get to the science, it’s indisputable.”

I received a call last weekend from a fellow member of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and he informed me thus:

What began in Iowa on Tuesday, January 3, 2012 and will continue to June 26 is an American tradition that AE911Truth needs you to participate in. Americans will be heading to their caucuses and primaries to select their preferred Presidential candidate. There are currently many Republican candidates traversing states and making local appearances in small venues. This gives you, the supporters of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a unique accessible opportunity to interact with the candidates and to make a simple statement or ask a simple question to educate and pin them down on the issue of a new investigation and have them state their stance – publicly, and ideally in front of the media. You can find the candidate’s web-sites to see where they will be meeting voters near you.

If you take advantage of this opportunity, take the time to ask the candidates their views on FrankenFoods; on dioxin poisoning our soil; on GMO labeling.
Your body depends on your choices for sustenance. If you give it bad stuff, that's what you'll get back - bad stuff.

RoundUp should more appropriately be called DropDead!

Submitted by Vincenzo (not verified) on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 1:29pm.

New research indicates that Roundup, the most common formulation of the herbicide glyphosate, is not only more toxic than its constituent ingredients, but is capable of damaging DNA within a human cell line when diluted down to 450-fold lower concentrations than presently used...

Marijuana Seedbanks and Seed Breeders

Submitted by SeedBank Review (not verified) on Fri, 05/11/2012 - 7:39pm.

<a href=" http://www.seedbankreview.com/">Marijuana Seed banks and Seed Breeders</a>