GMO Foods, Glyphosate, Autism & Obesity - Stephanie Seneff

Published on Jul 7, 2016

Welcome to Episode #147, with Stephanie Seneff, PhD. This interview was filmed in May of 2015 for the Autism Intensive interview series.

I received so many positive emails about her discussion on the Autism Intensive that I wanted to repost the interview for free.

➢ Connect with Dr. Seneff: http://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff

➢The Autism Intensive: http://theautismintensive.com

➢ Listen to the Audio in iTunes: http://highintensityhealth.com/itunes

-----------------------------------------Lets Connect--------------------------------------

➢ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/MikeMutzelMS

➢ Instagram https://www.instagram.com/metabolic_mike

--------------------------------------Key Takeaways----------------------------------

02:18 Glyphosate on Crops
03:05 Human Consumption of Glyphosate
04:35 History of Glyphosate
05:50 Glyphosate/Disease Correlations
06:38 Tracking Potential Causes of Autism
09:21 Gut Microbes and Glyphosate
10:13 New Glyphosate Product:
There are certain weeds that are coming that are so resistant, they just can't put enough glyphosate on there to kill them. This is a reason why the glyphosate is going up. Well, they’re saying, we’ve go to put another toxic chemical with that glyphosate to kill the weeds. 2,4-D is a component of agent orange. It's a regulated herbicide. It’s supposed to be much more toxic than glyphosate.
11:18 Testing/Studying Toxins in Humans (Long Term)
Seralini did a study. He studied rats over the entire lifespan. Three months things look pretty good. Four months start to see problems. Whole lifespan you get early death. You get mammary tumors. You get liver and kidney damage. You get reproductive problems. All these things show up after three months.
13:31 Oxalic Acid and Kidney Function
15:51 Preventing Glyphosate Exposure
19:32 Diseases Linked to Glyphosate Exposure
20:13 Bone Health and Glyphosate
22:01 Obesity, Toxins and Glyphosate
28:32 Glyphosate and the Gut Microbiome
30:34 Confined Animal Feeding Operations and Antibiotics
32:11 Glyposate and Gut Permeability (Leaky Gut)
36:24 Glyphosate and Methylation (MTHFR)
38:15 Folic Acid, Folate and GMO Foods
49:48 Estrogen Disruption and Glyphosate

IT HAS BEGUN

From JSF:  

Scott's Miracle Grow developed a line of GMO grass for golf putting greens in the 90's, brought it to fruition in growing trials in the early 2000's, and then had a huge wind storm come through the test area and carry the seed for miles across the Snake River Canyon, into neighboring Oregon. There it has been found across a wide area, and it is threatening Oregon's grass seed industry.

Golf putting greens have a problem - the type of grass they use is not robust enough to keep out the invading grass from the rest of the golf course, so it is difficult to maintain them nicely. Scott's tried to overcome this problem by making a strain of putting green grass that was completely resistant to Round Up, so golf course owners could simply spray the putting greens with round up and be done with it.

PROBLEM: The genetic modifications turned it into a super grass that was not like the predecessor. It can overtake any natural grass and is completely resistant to round up. So efforts to eradicate it from the Oregon side of the Snake River Canyon have all failed miserably and it continues to spread in Oregon. Scotts has already spent $500 million trying to eradicate it from Oregon and has failed miserably, they can't wipe it out. This is a great case against GMOs.

SEE THIS

Hey, everyone!

Thanks for coming by. PC was being bad, and posting otherwise is a PITA, so I've been on MINDS. I have tons of stuff posted there, and a great community of folks with various ideas as to how the world works, as Allan Weisbecker is wont to say.

Trump is in. No gloating from me. That's never been my thing. I'm a truth bomber, if anything. On MINDS, it's like being gifted a stealth bomber.

Want to be like me, but anonymously?

Try CANDID.

Click to open in its own window

I Declare WAR!

Happy Friday, dear readers!



The profanity was part of the FB posting, just so you understand. This is not going to turn into the Potty Mouth Picture Show.



Rehab facility has accepted me for treatment for the next two weeks -  it's a wonderful facility and now I have my laptop, so I can clean up the spelling errors within).



You'll note (only if you are part of my FB family) that I was on a bit of a tear for the last couple of days...and then I disappeared rather abruptly last night.



I embarked on a Candy Crush marathon; waiting for lives to be replenished at Level 28. Will go back to a couple of levels (now 37!).



So, I awaken this morning, and I put on the Ted Broer show. Ted and his family runs Healthmasters.com - this is an ultra high-end nutrition and wellness company. Ted is 62 and totally kick-ASS!



So imagine my surprise when the show begins, and it sounds as if they are reading my postings of the last couple of days live!!!



WOW!



What an affirmation that I am doing the right thing!!!



Here's the URL of the show in question: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/the-ted-broer-show-mp3-edition/id1050535625?mt=2#episodeGuid=http%3A%2F%2Fmediaarchives.gsradio.net%2FTed_Broer%2F060216.mp3



Now, you could surmise that I'm utterly full of shite (one change I have made is using the actual invective instead of FCUK...people drop the F-bomb like girls drop a Beej - but that doesn't mean that a liberal use of the word 'shite' without the 'e' is warranted), but I have that posting archived and date stamped.



Anyone familiar with my work will actually gasp in astonishment - just imagine that the show you're hearing is the show as always performed by Ted and Austin Broer...but that the first fifteen minutes have been scripted by yours truly.



Here's some of that data:



Okay...are you ready for some information?


I currently write a blog regarding the dangers of GMOs,and while I haven't personally performed the experiments upon the FrankenFoods I strive to avoid, I can follow along on the research performed by the likes of Dr. Don Huber, Professor Stephanie Seneff​​, Anthony Samsel and others.


One of the methods used by their pesticides is chelation. Chelation works by binding with vitamins and nutrients so that organisms cannot absorb them.


(that means US, as well).
GMOs, simply by nature of this function, cannot possibly provide the same level of nutrition as conventional and/or organic crops.


There are a line of products that go by the designation BT, and they have been modified to create a toxin within their cells that explode the stomach of the insects that ingest them. Two problems with this:


1. Stomachs are stomachs. Why would one suppose that our stomachs aren't affected by the BT toxin? Traces have been found in human intestines;


2. These people cannot be serious scientists...how is it that one would go in and change the functionality of a cell, and yet not expect that some functionality not directly related to said function to be affected?


Lastly, adaptation. Flora and fauna adapt, or they die.


We now have superweeds and superbugs.


Thanks, Monsanto.


(this was typed on an iPhone with huge sausage-like fingers, so i hope you appreciate this.)



To the scumbags and utter MOTHERFUCKERS of our world - I just want you to know that you are now irrevocably and throroughly FUCKED...and I mean porn-style, all orifices, money shot FUCKED!



I will NEVER GIVE UP on making our world a better place.



NEVER.



So, FUCK OFF right now to a coffin, get in that bitch, close the lid and nail it shut from the inside, or, rest assured, I will be there to take a hammer to your rotten skulls, and a 2x4 to your holes.



I am not kidding, FUCKTARDS - the MOTHERFUCKING MAIN MAN HAS DECLARED ALL-OUT WAR ON SHITHEADS, SCUMBAGS AND UTTER DOUCHEBAGGERY.



Feel that spiked glove across your cheek...that's the love tap before the fisting...and I don't use lube.

Update:  Here's a great blog - It Is What It Is - Dr. Rex

Just a teaser:

Off-Topic Post...Or Bloody Marys On A Sunday Sure Are Tasty

It's a beautiful Sunday morning, two and a half years after something utterly horrible happened to me.

Three months later, I was forced to do something that has haunted me for over two years.

Two days ago...the haunting ended.

I can't tell you how happy I am now...but my happiness is mitigated by the fact that there are still FrankenFoods out there.

I

WANT

THEM

GONE.

Why?

The bees are being killed by their FrankenPoisons.

GMO crops are utterly devoid of nutrition.

To date, over 300,000 Indian (curry-in-a-hurry, not woo-woo) farmers have committed suicide over the non-gains from switching to GMO seeds.

Okay...maybe I haven't convinced you of anything...maybe those Indian farmers were just dopey; or bees are being "racist" against GMO plants...maybe you're drinking much more potent vodka than I am.

Here's the cement point for me (and should be, for you): TERMINATOR SEEDS.

Now, the name sounds great, doesn't it? Some bloody PR firm must have broken exactly 4 brain cells to come up with that.

When you first think "terminator seeds", one has to hearken back to the Governator's absolute best film, The Terminator. What's the most recognizable tagline?

"I'll be back."

Now, if one is attributing that to seeds...well, boy, did you FCUK up badly.

Terminator seeds are designed to do the ABSOLUTE BLOODY OPPOSITE; in other words, when you plant GMO crops, the seeds are only good for that planting. You have seeds left?

YOU

CAN'T

USE

THEM

It's all in the agreement forms you signed. I'm fairly certain that the print is in single digit type.

Ever since man became sedentary and learned the art of farming, saving seeds has been a staple part of maintenance.

Not if you partner with the myriad of chemical companies that are behind the push for replacing our crops with GMOs.

You have to buy the seeds EACH AND EVERY YEAR.

That's more money out of your pockets, farmers.

Let's not mention the crap one must spray upon these FrankenCrops. What do you think it's doing to the soil?

Of course, these idiots have never come across a simple term: ADAPTATION.

Now, thanks to these FCUKwads, we now have SUPERbugs and SUPERweeds.

Seriously - there are weeds that can now break machinery.

Who's behind these very capricious decisions?

Chemical companies.

I still have a couple of BASF video tapes...why are they messing with our foods?

Dow - Agent Orange, right? Something doesn't taste right.

Pioneer - didn't they produce turntables and other audio equipment?

Now, I have some money saved, but I know I can't do this alone. So this is my call out to those interested in saving our world from the bastards and scumbags who think that a short-term investment will safeguard the well-being of their offspring are not even well-meaning idiots. They are the worst of humanity, because they can be cheaply bought and sold.

I can't be bought, because my most useful commodity is PRICELESS.

Life is like that.

See you all soon.

Let's Just Label Non-GMOs! (R8 Re-Post)

Let's Just Label Non-GMOs!

posted by Vincent Nunes
Sun, 12/23/2012 - 11:30am

Hey - we survived another apocalypse!
I did a posting in regards to Whole Foods Supermarket climbing in bed with Monsanto not too long ago; little did I realize that this wasn't just a late-night, drunken outcall - this liaison was fully sanctioned:

In this Infowars video, investigative reporters Aaron Dykes and Melissa Melton uncover a massive corporate lie at Whole Foods. On camera, a Whole Foods executive admits the company sells masses of GMOs, just like every other store in America. And yet the company has a giant logo emblazoned on the side of its store, claiming, "NOTHING ARTIFICIAL, EVER."

GMOs are, of course, artificial. They are "engineered by man," not naturally created by nature. This makes the Whole Foods marketing claim false and misleading. Even fraudulent.

Whole Foods is lying to its own customers about GMO!

Wow. That's amazing. How could an entity, in good conscience, continue to call themselves "Whole Foods" and, at the same time, sell to you processed foods that contain GMOs, and even GMO corn itself?
Of course, "good conscience" has nothng whatsoever to do with BUSINESS.
When I read one of Jon Rappoport's many pieces on Proposition 37 and the gaming of the vote count last month, I was at a loss for words. More importantly, the labeling of GMOs, as Jon rightly points out, really avoids the true issue - the issue being that GMOs must be removed altogether from our food supply before they irrepairabally damage our ecosystem and bring an end to life on Earth as we know it.
At this point, I must remind you all of Monsanto's "terminator gene", which stops the process of germination in Monsanto crops. This feature may not be active in their current crops, but trust me - it is THERE. When you sign a contract with Monsanto, you agree to buy their seeds, so the process of replanting crops, rather than being the organic process that farmers have done ever since man became a sedentary creature, is now part of that contract. You have to buy thos seeds annualy - there is no replanting allowed.
What if you didn't want to buy more seeds next year?
Well, Monsanto can simply TURN OFF YOUR CROPS.
Think about the frightening amount of control Monsanto would have if they could do that to our entire growable food supply?
So, I watched that video at Natural News - oh, have I mentioned that you cannot watch this on YouTube? It seems that we have a bit of an orgy going down in that bedchamber. Did anyone remember to bring the condoms and the AstroGlide? screw it - let's just go bareback - I mean, what's the worst that can happen?

Maybe there should be some background music playing - you know, some really cheesy soundtrack playing just loud enough so that you don't hear the director screaming, "More ass! Arch that back!" in the background...but I digress.
We are being groomed to prepare for the inevitabiliity of GMOs in our food supply.
Well, you know what? FINE.
There's GMOs in our food supply - but we don't have to BUY THEM.
Why fight with labeling the crap that's BAD for us?
Let's just label the stuff that's GOOD FOR US.
I propose that the organic farmers, food cooperatives and the conventional farms who have thus far managed to avoid contamination of their crops, band together and make it absolutely apparent that their crops and products contain No GMOs.
With the sloppy daisy chain going on behind the scenes, it seems to me an utter waste of energy attempting to get the bastards to fess up; so instead, let's leave them in their squalor.
Let the companies and farms that offer to you and I, their clients, real, whole, healthy foods, and let's put our sticker of approval on them.
Let's wear our brand proudly.
When those FrankenFoods are left on the shelves, and their FrankenCrops rot in the bins, the scumbags will know that We The People have spoken - and that our voice is loud, indeed.

 

• Categories: GMOs misrepresentation Monsanto organic Prop 37 terminator gene Whole Foods

---

 

Millions Spent Defeating Prop 37-GMOs: Why They Don't Want Us...

Submitted by Vincenzo (not verified) on Mon, 12/24/2012 - 5:13am.

Millions Spent Defeating Prop 37 - GMOs: Why They Don't Want Us To Know

Published on Nov 12, 2012

Howard Vlieger began studying GMO crops in 1994 and is fortunate to work with some of the lead scientists in the world on research projects involving GMO crops. The real life experience that he has from being a farmer and working with farmers all across the US gives him a unique perspective on GMOs. Howard has been giving presentations to educate people about GMOs for more than 6 years in 13 states.

Howard serves on the board of directors for the Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance (FARFA) and the Food Freedom Foundation.

Show Highlights:

Howard Vlieger and his organization Verity Farms have been researching the affects of genetically engineered crops on the soil, animals and humans since 1992. What they

have learned and see every day in 2012 is beyond spooky.

-The gut ecology is impaired when animals and humans consume GM organisms, at one tenth of a part per million

-BT Corn linked to poor conception rates, immune and digestive issues

-There are three top issues with genetic engineering of crops: the ecology of the soil, immune and digestive disruption and super weeds requiring more and more glyphosates.

-The birds and the bees are affected

-The story behind Roundup Ready Alfalfa, and it's not pretty

-These foreign proteins with GMO's are not digestible. Period

-Are you eating eggs fed GMO corn and Soy?

-The Germans are saying No to GMO's

-A strong immune system and our own garden are our best defense here.

-In 2010, 170 million acres of corn and soy were planted -- 92% GMO

-The Big Agriculture Companies get about 9 Billion Dollars per year in user fees alone from farmers using GMO seeds.

-Farmers and consumers are waking up to the dangers of GMO crops world wide

Please Support Organic and Non GMO Foods

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fsjh2DGhOeo

Click on the link below for full interview

http://www.oneradionetwork.com/health/howard-vlieger-gmos-and-glyphosate-resi...

What’s up with Monsanto and genetically modified organisms (GMOs)? (R8 Re-Post)

What’s up with Monsanto and genetically modified organisms (GMOs)?

posted by Vincent Nunes
Mon, 07/11/2011 - 12:27pm

What’s up with Monsanto and genetically modified organisms (GMO)

Monsanto makes no apologies about the fact that it is doing genetic engineering to create a whole new breed of food crops. The word from this corporate giant is that it is working to develop crops that grow faster and are resistant to the things that typically cause crops to fail. Bottom line, they are producing more crops to feed more people. Seems to make sense, doesn’t it. After all the new GMO seeds have been tested and found to be safe, right?






Maybe not. Many geneticists believe that if we error we should error on the side of safety. Living organisms are incredibly complex. If you thought a computer was an engineering complexity, just wait until to see DNA. So, their bottom line is that there really isn’t enough solid research to know whether the GMOs are really safe or not.
What is certain is that Monsanto is out to improve their bottom line, and, frankly that is their legal obligation for their investors. One way that Monsanto has approached this is to create GMO seeds that don’t reproduce. Throughout the history of the planet, the way crops worked is that you planted a seed, it grew into a plant, you ate part of the plant, but the plant also produced more seeds that you could plant and start the cycle again. Monsanto has managed to make plants that don’t grow more plants, and that means you have to keep buying Monsanto seeds to grow more plants. It’s actually pretty clever.
The point is that Monsanto is out to make some money by doing Genetic Engineering. Some of the genetic engineering is well intended, but other genetic engineering is all about making more profit.

So what does this have to do with Chemtrails?

One of the “dots” that seems to be backed by some solid research is that the soil in places that are exposed to chemtrails show an unusually high amount of aluminum. Another interesting dot is the role that was played by the Aluminum industry in the fluoridation of our water. A third interesting dot is the fact that Monsanto has developed GMOs that are resistant to aluminum in the soil. The question is whether these three dots need to be connected.
Michael Murphy, noted chemtrails researcher, seems to think so. In his writings he says there is no coincidence in the fact that chemtrails seem to contain aluminum and Monsanto has seeds that flourish in aluminum rich soil were most other plants die… just another way to increase the bottom line. Kill of the normal plants so that everyone has to buy Monsanto seeds.
Others point out that aluminum rich soil is naturally occurring in some areas and so it makes sense for Monsanto to develop such a product. There is quite a bit of information on the internet concerning this topic. Do a little hunting and come up with your own conclusions. The question is whether the food industry is willing to poison us and destroy the natural environment in order to make a buck. So far, their track record seems to be to make a buck before really worrying about the impacts of what they are doing.

Original URL: http://enjoyabetterworld.com/2011/03/11/chemtrails-aluminum-and-monsanto-genetic-engineering-ge/
Do your own research.

Further reading

Submitted by Vincenzo (not verified) on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 3:03pm.

http://farmwars.info/?p=2927

reply | email this comment

Did the Casey Anthony trial obfuscate THIS?

Submitted by Vincenzo (not verified) on Mon, 07/11/2011 - 4:01pm.

http://motherjones.com/environment/2011/07/usda-deregulate-roundup-gmo-tom-philpott
Just the beginning paragraphs, dear readers:

It's a hoary bureaucratic trick, making a controversial announcement on the Friday afternoon before a long weekend, when most people are daydreaming about what beer to buy on the way home from work, or are checking movie times online. But that's precisely what the US Department of Agriculture pulled last Friday.
In an innocuous-sounding press release titled "USDA Responds to Regulation Requests Regarding Kentucky Bluegrass," agency officials announced their decision not to regulate a "Roundup Ready" strain of Kentucky bluegrass—that is, a strain genetically engineered to withstand glyphosate, Monsanto's widely used herbicide, which we know as Roundup. The maker of the novel grass seed, Scotts Miracle Gro, is now free to sell it far and wide. So you'll no doubt be seeing Roundup Ready bluegrass blanketing lawns and golf courses near you—and watching anal neighbors and groundskeepers literally dousing the grass in weed killer without fear of harming a single precious blade.
Which is worrisome enough. But even more worrisome is the way this particular product was approved. According to Doug Gurian-Sherman, senior scientist at the Union of Concerned Scientists' Food and Environment Program, the documents released by the USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) along with the announcement portend a major change in how the feds will deal with genetically modified crops.
Notably, given the already-lax regulatory regime governing GMOs (genetically modified organisms, click here for a primer), APHIS seems to be ramping down oversight to the point where it is essentially meaningless. The new regime corresponding with the bluegrass announcement would "drastically weaken USDA’s regulation," Gurian-Sherman told me. "This is perhaps the most serious change in US regs for [genetically modified] crops for many years."

Be afraid...but don't just sit back - demand ANSWERS.
 

Monsanto-Resistant Weeds Take Root, Raising Food Prices

Submitted by Vincenzo (not verified) on Thu, 07/21/2011 - 2:28pm.

http://www.fastcompany.com/1768090/resistant-weeds-take-roots-and-threaten-food-supply?partner=gnews

Equivalence, The Big Lie Of GMOs

Have you ever visited Madame Tussaud's Wax Museum in Times Square?

If you have, you have experienced EQUIVALENCE.

Many people have been sighted taking photographs with the representations of celebrities. However, those are merely the EQUIVALENT of said celebrities.

I want for you to understand that the same has happened to genetically modified organisms.

Former President George Herebert Walker Bush was either deceived by the progenitors of GMOs, or he is in on the scheme, but one must recognize the fact that a patent can only apply to a DIFFERENCE in the creation being patented. In plainer terms, a GMO can't, by logic, be "equivalent" to organically or conventionally grown crops.

Let's get into a bit of science here.

An action causes an equal and opposite reaction. This is a bit of scientific fact, thus far.

This applies to genetic modification, as well.

One cannot instill a change in an organism without that change affecting said organism in unobvious ways.

One of the main "hallmarks" of GMOs is that they are modified to withstand massive amounts of company-owned herbicides.

Why is this a good thing in anyone's mind?

First, let's account for the mere presence of said pesticide in the soil. GMOs grow despite the presence of the pesticide, but understand that the one of the purposes of the pesticide is as a chelator, which means that beneficial compounds are sequestered away from organisms looking to utilize them.

What, then, is fueling the growth of the GMO, then?

The PESTICIDE?!?

It's a fair question to posit. I don't have the answer, at present.

The soil, itself, is destroyed, for purposes of propogation. Farmers have dropped millions of tons of pesticides upon their fields.

The organisms themselves exhibit lower concentrations of nutrients. This is something that should have been expected, and proably was, by true scientists.

If organisms are bred to enhance certain characteristics, other characteristics will then become less prevalent.

There are many ideas upon which to expand - I will need more time to properly expound upon said ideas. I would also appreciate input from others, be you scientists or interested parties. I am going to repost former Room Eight pieces that are germane to the issue of GMOs, and I hope to have information convicing you all to contact your representatives and let them know, in no uncertain terms, to say NO! to GMOs in our food supply.

Farmers should take a look at the expenditures one must make, and all of the restrictions that they are now subject to upon agreeing to plant GMOs in what was formerly their properties.

Those farms are now the future properties of the GMO proponents. If you commit one error, your fields are FORFEIT.

Read the agreements.

Is it really so "backwards" to have actual human beings paid a wage to keep your fields free of weeds?

The "Superweeds" are a direct result of non-scientists not understanding a simple word: ADAPTATION. The same goes for the new breed of insects immune to those pesticides.

The answer is NOT spraying more and worse toxins onto and into our soil.

The answer is to remove not only these toxins, but also, GMOs, from our land.